Triggered at line # 2387
FeedWordPress version: 0.992
WordPress version: 2.5
PHP version: 5.2.6
SyndicatedPost (_wp_id problem): object(SyndicatedPost)#177 (9) {
["item"]=>
array(13) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-3872549972806220792"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-23T13:34:00.005Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-23T13:41:09.902Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-23T13:41:09.902Z"
}
["atom_content"]=>
string(963) "My head's buried pretty deeply in textbooks these days, but I did think this item was worth drawing attention to:
Alistair Darling will make a high-risk bid to lead Britain out of recession tomorrow, when he is expected to cut VAT and entice the British people to go on a pre-Christmas spending spree.
...
The cut is expected to see the rate drop from its current level of 17.5 per cent
Meanwhile, of course, down here in the Free State, VAT is set to go up from 21 to 21.5% as of Monday week.
Should do wonders for the "don't shop in Newry" campaign, huh?
"
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/3872549972806220792/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=3872549972806220792&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/3872549972806220792?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/3872549972806220792"
["link"]=>
string(74) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/11/my-heads-buried-pretty-deeply-in.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
["link"]=>
object(SyndicatedLink)#145 (4) {
["id"]=>
string(2) "26"
["link"]=>
object(stdClass)#157 (23) {
["link_id"]=>
string(2) "26"
["link_url"]=>
string(29) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/"
["link_name"]=>
string(31) "Wednesday's Irish politics blog"
["link_image"]=>
string(0) ""
["link_target"]=>
string(0) ""
["link_category"]=>
string(1) "0"
["link_description"]=>
string(19) "Irish Politics Blog"
["link_visible"]=>
string(1) "Y"
["link_owner"]=>
string(1) "1"
["link_rating"]=>
string(1) "0"
["link_updated"]=>
string(19) "0000-00-00 00:00:00"
["link_rel"]=>
string(0) ""
["link_notes"]=>
string(2553) "feed/id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384
feed/updated: 2008-12-04T22:02:35.757Z
feed/title: Wednesday's Irish politics blog
feed/link: http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/
feed/link_next: http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?start-index=26&max-results=25
feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed: http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
feed/link_self: http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
feed/author_name: Wednesday
feed/generator: Blogger
feed/opensearch/totalresults: 194
feed/opensearch/startindex: 1
feed/opensearch/itemsperpage: 25
update/last: 1231294597
update/ttl: 77
update/timed: automatically
update/hold: scheduled
feed/id#: 1
feed/updated#: 1
feed/title#: 1
feed/title@: type,xml:base
feed/title@type: text
feed/title@xml:base: http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
feed/link#: 1
feed/link@: rel,type,href
feed/link@rel: alternate
feed/link@type: text/html
feed/link@href: http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/
feed/link_next#: 1
feed/link_next@: rel,type,href
feed/link_next@rel: next
feed/link_next@type: application/atom+xml
feed/link_next@href: http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?start-index=26&max-results=25
feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed#: 1
feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed@: rel,type,href
feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed@rel: http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed
feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed@type: application/atom+xml
feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed@href: http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
feed/link_self#: 1
feed/link_self@: rel,type,href
feed/link_self@rel: self
feed/link_self@type: application/atom+xml
feed/link_self@href: http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
feed/author#: 1
feed/author_name#: 1
feed/generator#: 1
feed/generator@: version,uri
feed/generator@version: 7.00
feed/generator@uri: http://www.blogger.com
feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//totalresults#: 1
feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//totalresults: 182
feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//startindex#: 1
feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//startindex: 1
feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//itemsperpage#: 1
feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//itemsperpage: 25
feed/modified#: 1
feed/modified: 2008-04-03T13:23:36.754+01:00
feed/dc/creator#: 1
feed/dc/creator: Wednesday
feed/author: Wednesday
feed/author_uri: http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208
feed/author_email: noreply@blogger.com
map authors: name\nwednesday\n14
"
["link_rss"]=>
string(48) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"
["object_id"]=>
string(2) "26"
["term_taxonomy_id"]=>
string(1) "5"
["term_order"]=>
string(1) "0"
["term_id"]=>
string(1) "3"
["taxonomy"]=>
string(13) "link_category"
["description"]=>
string(16) "Feeds Aggregated"
["parent"]=>
string(1) "0"
["count"]=>
string(2) "12"
["recently_updated"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
["settings"]=>
array(65) {
["feed/id"]=>
string(34) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384"
["feed/updated"]=>
string(24) "2008-12-04T22:02:35.757Z"
["feed/title"]=>
string(31) "Wednesday's Irish politics blog"
["feed/link"]=>
string(29) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/"
["feed/link_next"]=>
string(78) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?start-index=26&max-results=25"
["feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed"]=>
string(48) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"
["feed/link_self"]=>
string(48) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"
["feed/author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["feed/generator"]=>
string(7) "Blogger"
["feed/opensearch/totalresults"]=>
string(3) "194"
["feed/opensearch/startindex"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/opensearch/itemsperpage"]=>
string(2) "25"
["update/last"]=>
int(1231300267)
["update/ttl"]=>
int(101)
["update/timed"]=>
string(13) "automatically"
["update/hold"]=>
string(9) "scheduled"
["feed/id#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/updated#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/title#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/title@"]=>
string(13) "type,xml:base"
["feed/title@type"]=>
string(4) "text"
["feed/title@xml:base"]=>
string(48) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"
["feed/link#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/link@"]=>
string(13) "rel,type,href"
["feed/link@rel"]=>
string(9) "alternate"
["feed/link@type"]=>
string(9) "text/html"
["feed/link@href"]=>
string(29) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/"
["feed/link_next#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/link_next@"]=>
string(13) "rel,type,href"
["feed/link_next@rel"]=>
string(4) "next"
["feed/link_next@type"]=>
string(20) "application/atom+xml"
["feed/link_next@href"]=>
string(78) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?start-index=26&max-results=25"
["feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed@"]=>
string(13) "rel,type,href"
["feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed@rel"]=>
string(37) "http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed"
["feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed@type"]=>
string(20) "application/atom+xml"
["feed/link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed@href"]=>
string(48) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"
["feed/link_self#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/link_self@"]=>
string(13) "rel,type,href"
["feed/link_self@rel"]=>
string(4) "self"
["feed/link_self@type"]=>
string(20) "application/atom+xml"
["feed/link_self@href"]=>
string(48) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"
["feed/author#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/author_name#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/generator#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/generator@"]=>
string(11) "version,uri"
["feed/generator@version"]=>
string(4) "7.00"
["feed/generator@uri"]=>
string(22) "http://www.blogger.com"
["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//totalresults#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//totalresults"]=>
string(3) "182"
["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//startindex#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//startindex"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//itemsperpage#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//itemsperpage"]=>
string(2) "25"
["feed/modified#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/modified"]=>
string(29) "2008-04-03T13:23:36.754+01:00"
["feed/dc/creator#"]=>
string(1) "1"
["feed/dc/creator"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["feed/author"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["feed/author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["feed/author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["map authors"]=>
array(1) {
["name"]=>
array(1) {
["wednesday"]=>
int(14)
}
}
["link/uri"]=>
string(48) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"
["link/name"]=>
string(31) "Wednesday's Irish politics blog"
["link/id"]=>
string(2) "26"
}
["magpie"]=>
object(MagpieRSS)#169 (19) {
["parser"]=>
int(0)
["current_item"]=>
array(0) {
}
["items"]=>
array(25) {
[0]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-6866079651303699574"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-27T10:18:00.004Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-27T10:45:08.017Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-27T10:45:08.017Z"
}
["title"]=>
string(24) "Quick note on Harneygate"
["atom_content"]=>
string(1889) "As much as I dislike Mary Harney - and boy, do I dislike her - I'm finding myself fairly disgusted with the calls for her step down for getting her hair done on the public purse.
It's not that I think the expenditure was justified. But I can't recall anyone saying that Bertie should step down when it was revealed that more than the average industrial wage was being spent on his make-up. People said it was excessive, certainly. But his position wasn't held to be "untenable" because of it.
You can't separate this hullaballoo from gender issues. Women in the public eye are relentlessly judged for their appearance, Harney more than many others. There is a really nasty undertone to some of the comments being made in the blogosphere about this. Women who consider standing for election know full well they'll be subject to the same excruciating level of scrutiny for their hair, their clothes, their weight. Don't think for a moment this isn't a contributing factor to the under-participation of women in politics.
Harney should resign, of course. But I've always said that. She should resign because of the millions of taxpayer euros she's giving away to developers at the expense of the public healthcare system. That's the important issue, not the fact that she - like the Taoiseach and all male office holders - has an excessive personal appearance budget."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/6866079651303699574/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=6866079651303699574&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/6866079651303699574?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/6866079651303699574"
["link"]=>
string(66) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/11/quick-note-on-harneygate.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[1]=>
array(13) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-3872549972806220792"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-23T13:34:00.005Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-23T13:41:09.902Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-23T13:41:09.902Z"
}
["atom_content"]=>
string(963) "My head's buried pretty deeply in textbooks these days, but I did think this item was worth drawing attention to:
Alistair Darling will make a high-risk bid to lead Britain out of recession tomorrow, when he is expected to cut VAT and entice the British people to go on a pre-Christmas spending spree.
...
The cut is expected to see the rate drop from its current level of 17.5 per cent
Meanwhile, of course, down here in the Free State, VAT is set to go up from 21 to 21.5% as of Monday week.
Should do wonders for the "don't shop in Newry" campaign, huh?
"
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/3872549972806220792/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=3872549972806220792&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/3872549972806220792?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/3872549972806220792"
["link"]=>
string(74) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/11/my-heads-buried-pretty-deeply-in.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[2]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-6623835695751110738"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T13:37:00.004+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T14:51:28.737+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T14:51:28.737+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(24) "In other Blueshirt news,"
["atom_content"]=>
string(635) "it seems that little Terence Flanagan managed to fill only about a third of the thirty minutes alloted to him to speak on the Electoral Amendment Bill in the Dáil today.
He was the first opposition speaker to participate in the debate. I guess that's what happens when you have nobody to plagiarise ..."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/6623835695751110738/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=6623835695751110738&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/6623835695751110738?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/6623835695751110738"
["link"]=>
string(65) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/09/in-other-blueshirt-news.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[3]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-4436187573024994274"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T11:59:00.003+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T12:17:57.375+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T12:17:57.375+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(23) "Quick note on "pairing""
["atom_content"]=>
string(1716) "I'd imagine that few people, other than anoraks such as myself, had any idea what Enda Kenny was talking about when he announced that Fine Gael would refuse to "pair" with the Government over their refusal to allow a debate on the economy.
The Times helpfully explains that:
Under the vote-pairing deal, opposition TDs absent themselves from votes if a minister – with whom they have been “paired” cannot be present due to official business.
I'd just like to make it clear that it is not the case that pairing occurs only when a minister is away on official business. In fact, Fine Gael have quite willingly engaged in this practice when backbenchers have been away for personal reasons. They may be valid personal reasons, but so what? The point of pairing is to prevent important state business from grinding to a halt, which is something that all parties (at least theoretically) have an interest in. If the ruling parties can't get enough TDs elected to ensure their bills never fall due to too many non-official absences on their part, it's not the role of the opposition to give them a leg up.
And if you want to know how I know that FG (and others, incidentally, but never Sinn Féin) have engaged in this practice, it's because occasionally the list of "official pairs" inadvertently finds its way into my clutches."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/4436187573024994274/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=4436187573024994274&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/4436187573024994274?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/4436187573024994274"
["link"]=>
string(63) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/09/quick-note-on-pairing.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[4]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-2553176457633230727"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-12T11:38:00.009+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-12T12:23:28.870+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-12T12:23:28.870+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(26) "No sex please, we're Irish"
["atom_content"]=>
string(4894) "Ah, the irony. Only yesterday over at the Cedar Lounge a contributor drew a rather smug distinction between the US and this country on the basis of the public role of religious extremists – over there, we were told, they are “political movers and shakers” while here they are confined merely to “prayer crusades”. My immediate reaction, as noted on the linked page, was to point out the flaw in that argument from a non-partitionist perspective. And then I went to have a look at today’s papers and found these news items from well below the border: 750 pornographic DVDs seized in Dublin and Labour calls for laws to fight sex shops.
Let’s look at these one at a time. The first article tells us that the DVDs were seized “as a result of an ongoing Community Policing Unit investigation into breaches of the Video Recording Act of 1989”. Yes, you read that correctly. A Community Policing Unit investigation into porn videos. In Dublin 2. Honestly, have the community police there no better use of their time? Maybe going after the tourist-muggers in Temple Bar? The gangs that hang round ATMs on Grafton Street waiting to distract you and grab your cash? The bicycle thieves on George’s Street? If the residential areas in that part of the city are anything like mine, I’d guess there are a few social housing estates whose residents have all but given up phoning the police when there are problems because the response is so thoroughly inadequate it isn’t even worth the effort. Well, now we know why. Maybe instead of reporting break-ins, drug dealing and cars on fire, they should tell the Gardaí there’s a porno outside.
The second article tells us that those champions of progressive, liberal values the Labour Party are shocked – shocked! – to find that not only do such DVDs exist, but the shops that sell them are subject to the same rules as any other shop. Not good enough apparently; they should have to apply for a specific change of use so that the wishes of those residents who would patronise such a shop can be vetoed by those residents who think they shouldn’t.
Labour’s Joe Costello is particularly outraged that two adult shops were able to open across from churches in his constituency. That’s my constituency too, and I know at least one of the shops he’s referring to, and frankly the fact that anyone could get exercised about it suggests to me that they are either stuck in de Valeraland or have far too much time on their hands. The part of the shop that is visible to anyone outside it is very discreetly-designed; there is no merchandise in view or any images whatsoever. If you couldn’t read enough English to know what “adult shop” meant, you wouldn’t even know what it was. Apart from the extraneous apostrophe in “DVD’s”, in fact, I’m hard pressed to find anything offensive about it. And so the fuck what if it’s across from a church? What gives people coming to or going from church the right not to encounter any reminders of how the human race reproduces?
There’s an argument to be made, from a community perspective, against having a whole conglomerate of these shops in one neighbourhood. An area that has come to be known as a red light district can be fairly unpleasant to live in, in some cases even unsafe. But that’s not the argument Labour are making. Effectively, they want local authorities to be able to prevent any sex shop from opening anywhere if enough people (and how many is “enough”?) complain that it’s unsuitable. The Council’s attempt less than ten years ago to close the Ann Summers on O’Connell Street – O’Connell Street, for fuck’s sake – suggests that such a power is likely to be interpreted broadly, making adult shops all but impossible to open in the State. Would it be the end of the world if that happened? Of course not, but it would further undermine any claim of Ireland (south) to be somehow more secularly advanced than the US.
We may not put people like Sarah Palin in high office here, but it doesn't look to me like we need them."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/2553176457633230727/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=2553176457633230727&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/2553176457633230727?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/2553176457633230727"
["link"]=>
string(66) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/09/no-sex-please-were-irish.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "8"
}
}
[5]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(58) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-519935665485553286"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-08-20T10:07:00.004+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-12T12:20:11.694+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-12T12:20:11.694+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(31) "What's wrong with this picture?"
["atom_content"]=>
string(2031) "From today's Times:
A 17-YEAR-old girl, whom gardaí believe was trafficked into Ireland to work in the sex industry, has been remanded on continuing bail.
...
The girl, who is from Nigeria and cannot be named for legal reasons, is charged with failing to produce a passport or another form of identification.
Now maybe this is a product of my wild imagination, but I can think of a pretty good reason why a person who had been trafficked into the country might not have a passport or another form of identification. A few pretty good reasons, in fact.
The Government has repeatedly justified its refusal to legislate for the rights of trafficking victims on the basis that the Garda Síochána treat all such persons "sympathetically", "with respect and dignity" and so on. Yes, that's exactly how I would describe bringing criminal charges against someone for not making sure they had their identity papers with them when they were trafficked.
The threat of prosecution, deportation and other such punitive measures is a very effective way to discourage trafficking victims coming forward. This is a no-brainer. It's so obvious that even Michael McDowell as Minister always insisted (not in so many words, admittedly) that it didn't happen. And yet that's precisely what's happening right now in Carlow-Kilkenny.
It's a disgrace and a scandal and I cannot understand why the migrant and women's rights sectors are not all over it.
"
["link_replies"]=>
string(158) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/519935665485553286/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=519935665485553286&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(74) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/519935665485553286?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(67) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/519935665485553286"
["link"]=>
string(71) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/08/whats-wrong-with-this-picture.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "5"
}
}
[6]=>
array(13) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-7617949953224684842"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-08-19T12:24:00.004+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-08-19T14:42:27.356+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-08-19T14:42:27.356+01:00"
}
["atom_content"]=>
string(4812) "As the dwindling numbers of people who read this blog will know, I haven't been excited by much Irish news lately. But this article, pressing as it does a number of my buttons, made me sit up and take notice:
TEACHERS last night gave a guarded backing to calls for immigrant children who cannot speak English properly to be "segregated" in our classrooms.
This followed a Fine Gael call yesterday for the Government to separate immigrant children with poor language skills from the rest of their classmates.
...
His comments attracted qualified support from the ASTI [secondary teachers' union] last night. However, they preferred to describe the teaching of immigrant children apart as putting them in “immersion classes” rather than “segregation”.
The ASTI spokeswoman said an understanding of English was the key to the integration of immigrant children in schools.
Doubtless there will be knee-jerk responses to this from both sides. Not that anybody listens to me, but I would plead for a few points to be kept in mind. The first being that there are several different considerations involved here, such as:
- How non-English speaking children can learn the language as quickly as possible
- How to prevent them falling behind in their other subjects
- How to ensure English-speaking children aren't brought down as a result of all this
The biggest problem, it seems to me, is that there isn't necessarily one solution that effectively addresses all three of these issues (and that's before we even get into the subject of the social and psychological effects of separating students). I remember the bilingual education debate that was raging in California when I lived there in the 1990s - for all I know, it still is. One side presented studies showing that totally immersing the kids in English was the quickest way to teach them the language. The other side presented studies showing that own-language education in addition to intensive English was the most effective way to promote their all-around academic achievement. Sometimes, these were the same studies. Even proponents of one particular viewpoint were at times forced to admit that it wasn't necessarily a question of finding the "right" solution, but of deciding which aim to prioritise.
Language is a funny beast. It arouses almost inexplicable passions in people, often in inverse proportion to the amount they actually know about it. As was once pointed out to me by a friend of mine with an advanced degree in the subject, so much about language is counter-intuitive - and yet there seems to be hardly anyone out there without a very firm, almost visceral, opinion on the right way to deal with the vexing linguistic issues that arise. It's true for a lot of subjects, of course, that people form views from which they can't be swayed no matter how much contrary evidence is put in front of them. But language seems to me to be exceptional in the extent to which people care so much on the basis of so little understanding of how it actually works.
And it hardly needs to be added that people's views on the subject are often influenced to a great degree by their views on immigration and multiculturalism in general. This makes it difficult, at times, to sort out legitimate concerns about educational standards from lumpen xenophobia just looking for a respectable excuse to latch onto. Of course this works in reverse too: those of us who think of diversity as a positive end in itself are sometimes guilty of not thinking through the practical consequences of policies designed to promote it.
The education of children is an area where society simply cannot afford the hazards of such knee-jerk reactions from either side. It's too important to be decided on the basis of who's shouting the loudest, or which policy fits most neatly within a particular overall ideological framework. The government needs to look very closely at the available evidence - of which there is plenty, just ask the Californians - and make the decision that is demonstrated to be genuinely best for the children, regardless of how (un)popular it is. I know what I hope that decision turns out to be, but it's not for me to advocate. I don't really understand how it works either.
"
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/7617949953224684842/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=7617949953224684842&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/7617949953224684842?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/7617949953224684842"
["link"]=>
string(81) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/08/as-dwindling-numbers-of-people-who-read.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[7]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-7072518951922247039"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-26T12:52:00.002+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-26T13:05:54.910+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-26T13:05:54.910+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(27) "Overheard in Leinster House"
["atom_content"]=>
string(598) "A Fine Gael TD making a call on their mobile:
"Hello ... , can I get back that €20 I loaned you yesterday? I'm meeting someone for coffee."
No wonder Enda Kenny has been so critical of the Government this week. You know times are tough when even culchies earning upwards of €95,000 have to go around begging for change for a cuppa."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/7072518951922247039/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=7072518951922247039&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/7072518951922247039?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/7072518951922247039"
["link"]=>
string(69) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/06/overheard-in-leinster-house.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[8]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-1238701235134578157"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-25T12:11:00.002+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-25T12:30:06.578+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-25T12:30:06.578+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(17) "Lessons unlearned"
["atom_content"]=>
string(1362) "Oh dear. It seems the Government is still having trouble getting its head around the reasons for the referendum defeat.
Hurriedly added to today's Dáil schedule is a motion to approve an agreement between the EU and Australia on the exchange of passenger information. The first that most TDs had heard of this agreement, with all its implications for confidentiality and data retention, was when a briefing note was circulated around 6.00 last night. Clearly, that's not enough time to scrutinise the agreement in detail - and the usual procedure of allowing an Oireachtas committee to thrash it out won't apply either. Why not? Where's the urgency?
With an absolutely straight face, Brian Cowen told the Dáil it had to be approved in this way, because ... the Slovenians are concluding their presidency of the EU soon and are anxious to have this on their record. And we're the only member state that hasn't got around to approving it yet.
Can anyone seriously argue these days that the parliament's role is as anything more than a rubber stamp? Even Cowen seemed embarrassed about it."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/1238701235134578157/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=1238701235134578157&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/1238701235134578157?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/1238701235134578157"
["link"]=>
string(59) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/06/lessons-unlearned.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[9]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-2348231991731675836"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-14T13:37:00.003+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-14T13:44:16.093+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-14T13:44:16.093+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(20) "Overheard at the RDS"
["atom_content"]=>
string(814) "As tallies from the first few boxes started to make it clear the treaty was headed for a defeat, from an apparatchik attached to a certain anonymous Dublin city Fianna Fáil TD: "Looks like we'll be back here in a few months."
From the same anonymous Fianna Fáil TD speaking on his mobile phone a few minutes later: "Oh, it's about two-to-one in favour."
From a certain Irish Times pol-corr (hint: thinks she's a lot funnier than she actually is) as the final tallies came through: "The Irish people are stupid."
More as I remember them..."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/2348231991731675836/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=2348231991731675836&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/2348231991731675836?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/2348231991731675836"
["link"]=>
string(58) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/06/overheard-at-rds.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "2"
}
}
[10]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-5021978872399808372"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-05-20T23:32:00.006+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-05-21T08:51:50.879+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-05-21T08:51:50.879+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(15) "Sanity prevails"
["atom_content"]=>
string(2523) "After all the controversy of the past few months, in the end it wasn't even close. British MPs voted 304 to 233 against lowering the abortion limit to 24 weeks. Immediately prior to that they'd voted not to reduce it to 20 weeks, 16 weeks or 12, the last two of these not even mustering 100 ayes.
There were a number of reasons for this strong pro-choice showing. Because of recent evidence that medicine is making no progress in improving survival rates for babies born before 24 weeks. Because less than 1.5% of all abortions in Britain are carried out after 20 weeks - and when they are, the reason for the delay is nearly always more serious than abortion opponents like to suggest. And, of course, because the absence of an authoritarian religious tradition means that most British people are not brainwashed from an early age into thinking of the foetus as a fully independent little person with all the rights of the woman whose body it is wholly dependent on. Sometimes I think we're not only on a different island over here, but on another planet.
It's a shame that an amendment that would have extended abortion rights to the Six Counties was withdrawn. By the looks of things it might have had a chance of passing, over the disgraceful opposition of all four of the major parties in the Six, including my own. (Chris Gaskin has astutely if ungrammatically pointed out the hypocrisy of the unionist parties in objecting to this aspect of British rule, but the truth is that all of them are simply calling for the problem to be exported.) So last night's vote wasn't the opportunity it could have been to take a step forward, but at least it wasn't a step back - and with all the anti-choice hysteria we've heard lately that in itself feels like a small victory.
Well done to Louise and other women in Britain who put so much effort into this.
"
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/5021978872399808372/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=5021978872399808372&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/5021978872399808372?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/5021978872399808372"
["link"]=>
string(57) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/05/sanity-prevails.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "7"
}
}
[11]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-6487603443013034525"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-05-17T09:58:00.004+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-05-17T10:35:35.867+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-05-17T10:35:35.867+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(17) "I know, I know..."
["atom_content"]=>
string(2100) "I've been terrible for updating this year. Apologies. Hopefully the normal order will be restored later in the summer, when life calms down a bit.
A quick thought for the moment. One of this blog's top bugbears, the Offences Against the State Act, is up for renewal next month. Previously the Green Party could always be counted on to oppose it (although they couldn't always be counted on to get all their TDs in for the vote). It was an admirable principled stance on an issue that had nothing to offer them electorally, and I was happy to give them credit for it.
Obviously this year will be different. They've lined up behind FF on every other issue, and there's no way they'll be let off the hook for this one. While I have some sympathy for the argument that compromise is necessary in a coalition - at least I've had to tell myself that every time I look to what's happening (or not) up north - it's notable that the Greens haven't really tended to make that argument, at least not in the Dáil chamber. Instead of acknowledging that they've had to do u-turns for the sake of their Cabinet seats, or even staying out of debates entirely and just showing up to hold their noses and vote on the Government side, they send their TDs in to argue why the Opposition is actually wrong to be taking this or that position at the present time. So I have to assume that when OASA comes up again they'll do the same. The only question is how they'll justify their reversal - gangland activity, I suppose, since it's hardly arguable that republicans or Islamic militants or anyone else with a political agenda poses any real threat at the moment. But we shall see.
If any Greens reading this have any ideas, I'd love to hear them."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/6487603443013034525/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=6487603443013034525&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/6487603443013034525?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/6487603443013034525"
["link"]=>
string(55) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/05/i-know-i-know.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[12]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(58) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-860488105022729252"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2008-01-09T10:27:00.000Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2008-01-09T11:06:34.458Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2008-01-09T11:06:34.458Z"
}
["title"]=>
string(37) "Policing pokes up its ugly head again"
["atom_content"]=>
string(2834) "I see that Hugh Orde met an Assembly committee yesterday on the matter of the devolution of policing and justice powers. Orde said he sees no reason not to meet the May 2008 target date while unionists, predictably, insist that it won't happen until certain other conditions are met (including, shockeroonie, another pre-condition for republicans).
Sinn Féin's response is here, and one line is particularly noteworthy:
The devolution of Policing and Justice was a key element in the negotiations that led to the restoration of the political institutions.
What that translates to, of course, is "We secured our membership's approval on the basis of a reassurance that policing and justice would be devolved by May 2008 and we're going to have serious problems if that doesn't actually happen". There is no other way to read it, given that all and sundry on the unionist side were making it perfectly clear when St Andrews was agreed that they were not signing up to a hard-and-fast deadline.
In a way it reminds me of the old decommissioning debate. The GFA, remember, called for all parties to "use their influence" to achieve decommissioning within two years. SF said at the time that this wasn't a deadline. The IRA at the time said flat-out that they would decommission only when they were good and ready to. Nonetheless, unionists insisted it was a time-locked guarantee and sold it to their people as such. We all know the rest.
The only real question now is - when May 2008 comes and goes and there is still no devolution, will the governments do as they did with decommissioning, insist there actually was a deadline and turn against the side refusing to meet it? Or will they take a literal interpretation of St Andrews and accept the unionists' demands for further concessions? Precedent only points to one answer.
***
On another matter, the unionists are apparently unhappy at the suggestion that the British Government might admit that there was a war going on in the Six Counties.
Well, Chichester-Clark admitted it 36 years ago, what's the point of denying it now?"
["link_replies"]=>
string(158) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/860488105022729252/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=860488105022729252&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(74) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/860488105022729252?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(67) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/860488105022729252"
["link"]=>
string(79) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/01/policing-pokes-up-its-ugly-head-again.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "7"
}
}
[13]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-8761528900337757986"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2008-01-04T19:07:00.001Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2008-01-04T19:48:41.041Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2008-01-04T19:48:41.041Z"
}
["title"]=>
string(57) "How many EU countries does it take to change a lightbulb?"
["atom_content"]=>
string(1706) "Apparently, all of them.
Green Party Minister for the Environment John Gormley discovered this today when he was told that his plans to ban incandescent lightbulbs might not go ahead - because they are not banned in the rest of the EU. According to RTÉ:
...under EU mutual recognition rules that govern the internal market, member states must allow the sale [of] any product that is legally for sale in another member state.
There are clearly some exceptions to this rule (cannabis and mifepristone come to mind), but the EU Commission seems to think that incandescent lightbulbs aren't one of them. So no ban unless Gormley can get every other member state to agree.
Whatever about the merits of the proposal, this rule strikes me as utterly mad and as confirmation of the unhealthy influence that business interests have over Brussels. It's also a warning signal about the loss of sovereignty that goes along with European integration. For all the Europhiles' insistence that we are not turning into a "United States of Europe", it's worth noting that a US state doesn't have to ask the permission of all 49 others before banning a product that it deems harmful.
Still, as I can't be arsed to research the regulation in detail, I'd very much welcome if someone wanted to explain to me exactly why it doesn't apply to mifepristone."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/8761528900337757986/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=8761528900337757986&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/8761528900337757986?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/8761528900337757986"
["link"]=>
string(79) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-many-eu-countries-does-it-take-to.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "4"
}
}
[14]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-2373519376119605747"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-23T18:41:00.000Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-23T19:12:17.160Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-23T19:12:17.160Z"
}
["title"]=>
string(38) "Latest news from abortion-free Ireland"
["atom_content"]=>
string(1402) "RTÉ has just carried the shocking news that women in Ireland are illegally ordering Mifepristone, the abortion pill, from an online site hosted outside the country.
At least, the news is shocking to RTÉ and to a doctor interviewed for the segment. Not shocking at all here in Wednesdayland, where it was predicted almost two years ago.
Apparently the authorities have contacted the site's owners informing them that the sale of mifepristone is illegal here. Which is, of course, precisely why the site exists. The owners have not responded yet, and probably won't. And there is virtually nothing the law can do about it - except, that is, to allow women to obtain the pill safely and legally from their GP. If we're not going to let that happen then we had better get used to the fact that women will find some other way to get it.
Incidentally, the site in question can be easily located with a Google search and one thing I can guarantee you is that plenty of Irish women who saw that RTÉ report will now be Googling desperately."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/2373519376119605747/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=2373519376119605747&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/2373519376119605747?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/2373519376119605747"
["link"]=>
string(80) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/11/latest-news-from-abortion-free-ireland.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "2"
}
}
[15]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(58) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-850807922853450602"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-16T17:57:00.000Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-16T18:14:33.600Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-16T18:14:33.600Z"
}
["title"]=>
string(60) "Why the Offences Against the State Act needs to go. Part 342"
["atom_content"]=>
string(1040) "Breaking news today:
Mark Doran, of Poacher's Lock, Leighlinbridge, Co Carlow, was convicted of membership of [the Real IRA]...the court was told that, during a search of Mr Doran's flat, gardaí had found military manuals, books and DVDs, raffle tickets used during a fundraiser for the families of IRA prisoners, and two bodhrans, one with a picture of a woman with a rifle and the other with signatures from several Port Laoise prisoners.
Delivering the court's judgment, Mr Justice Mc Menamin said that such material was "consistent only with significant paramilitary involvement".
'Innocent until proven republican' is still the law in this country, so it seems."
["link_replies"]=>
string(158) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/850807922853450602/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=850807922853450602&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(74) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/850807922853450602?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(67) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/850807922853450602"
["link"]=>
string(81) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/11/why-offences-against-state-act-needs-to.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[16]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-2797764369515882341"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-15T18:07:00.000Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-15T18:12:41.565Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-15T18:12:41.565Z"
}
["title"]=>
string(20) "On another matter..."
["atom_content"]=>
string(405) "... I don't know what the fuck is going on in the Six County Department of Education, but I would like to disassociate myself from it completely.
Sin é."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/2797764369515882341/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=2797764369515882341&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/2797764369515882341?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/2797764369515882341"
["link"]=>
string(59) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/11/on-another-matter.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "3"
}
}
[17]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-1602640329399841561"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-15T13:54:00.000Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-15T19:49:04.600Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-15T19:49:04.600Z"
}
["title"]=>
string(20) "An dlí is an teanga"
["atom_content"]=>
string(6652) "An email found its way into my inbox this week, asking for my signature on a petition to oppose the Labour Party’s new Legal Practitioners Qualification Amendment Bill. The purpose of this bill is to remove the Irish language requirement for persons wishing to train as solicitors or barristers. According to the petition, the consequences of its enactment would be as follows:
1. That this bill will damage the status and usage of the Irish language generally, and especially damage the status of Irish in the legal system.
2. That it will be impossible for Irish speakers to obtain their rights in the courts of this country if this bill is passed.
3. That court cases and services in Irish should be offered in all Irish courts, in order to give equal rights to Irish speakers, rather than proposing to take away these rights.
4. That this bill will pose a threat to the Irish language under the Constitution, as our first official language. There will also be implications for the status of the Irish language in Europe, where Irish-speaking lawyers are in demand.
5. That this bill has implications for the coutnry's [sic] independence. If the requirement for an oral Irish exam for lawyers is abolished, our legal system will be able to slide back into the English legal system, as matters stood before 1921.
Let’s look at the background to this. Under the original act, which dates from 1929, and the Solicitors Act 1954, any person wishing to train as a solicitor or barrister in the state must pass Irish language examinations at an early stage of their training. The examinations are both oral and written and there are no exemptions (except for solicitors trained in other countries who wish to have their qualifications recognised here). The standard of Irish required to pass the exams is said to be fairly low for those training as solicitors, higher - although I'm not sure how much higher - for those training as barristers.
So how valid are the objections raised in the petition? I’m going to discount #5 straightaway because it is, frankly, ridiculous. I think #4 is a weak argument too. There are no proposals to remove Irish as the first official language, and it’s not clear what the ‘implications for the status of the Irish language in Europe’ would be. If Irish-speaking lawyers are in demand in Europe, then surely that demand itself would act as an incentive for prospective lawyers to learn Irish, with or without a requirement that they do so. (A similar argument can be made for #2, although I think there’s a more pertinent issue on that one, which I’ll come to later.)
#1 is based on a generalised view that Irish language requirements are an essential component in maintaining the status of Irish. I think it has to be said that the (de facto) status of Irish in this country is poor enough even with these requirements and if they are what we are counting on to save the language, we’re in big trouble. This is not an argument against compulsory Irish per se – I would still strongly support it for primary and secondary students, up to Leaving Cert level, albeit with a vastly reworked curriculum to ensure that they are actually learning the language and not memorising only the amount that they need to pass their exams. If we had that in place then perhaps the language would be used enough to create a real need for Irish speakers in a wide range of professions. But the current half-arsed situation, in which only a small minority of people will ever have to use the language after they finish school, seems to me to do as much harm as good to its status.
So that leaves us with 2 and 3. Leaving aside the former's hyperbole, I think these are the strongest arguments in favour of retaining the requirement. Irish is the first language of the state, and its speakers must have the right to use it to conduct their official business. But there’s a serious question as to whether the current law actually protects that right. As I noted earlier, the solicitors’ exams are, by all accounts, fairly easy – meaning you don’t have to speak Irish particularly well to pass them. Is a Gaeilgeoir who wants to conduct their legal business through the national language really protected by a system that admits persons with only a rudimentary knowledge of that language? Given the intricacies of the law, and the extreme degree of preciseness needed in drafting and responding to legal documents, wouldn’t any such person be sure to seek out a fluent Irish speaker rather than someone who’d just managed to pass a couple perfunctory exams? I have no idea how many fluent speakers there are in the legal profession; this category, unfortunately, was not included in the recent Census breakdown of Irish speakers by occupation. But if there are many, it’s obviously not because of the law - as the law does not require fluency - and so the law is unnecessary for this purpose. And if there are few, then the law is failing this purpose. So either way, the case really isn't made for its retention.
Now having said all this, I don’t like the Labour Party bill either. It would replace the compulsory Irish exam with a 'voluntary system of recognising competence in the Irish language' – so you get a little star by your name in the Golden Pages or something, I guess. This is not the way I would go about reforming the present system. I don’t think there should be no requirement for solicitors and barristers to have Irish – but the requirement should be meaningful, and should be implemented in such a way as to actually encourage and facilitate learning of the language, and of course to not form a barrier to access to the legal profession. The recently-introduced policy of the Garda Síochána seems to me to be a common-sense way to go about this: Irish is now a mandatory part of the training regime for those applicants who don’t already have it.
I’ll conclude by (re-)stating the obvious: this dilemma wouldn’t exist if the government cared enough to ensure that the language was taught properly in the schools in the first place, and to provide adequate Irish education for adults."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/1602640329399841561/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=1602640329399841561&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/1602640329399841561?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/1602640329399841561"
["link"]=>
string(54) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/11/dl-is-teanga.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "2"
}
}
[18]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-6762187931814481462"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-10T09:36:00.000Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-15T19:50:36.300Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2007-11-15T19:50:36.300Z"
}
["title"]=>
string(34) "Republican revisionism and the GFA"
["atom_content"]=>
string(1655) "I've just been listening to Newstalk 106, where Des Dalton of Republican Sinn Féin was briefly interviewed on the subject of that party's Ard Fheis, to be held this weekend.
In the course of the interview it was put to Dalton that the people of Ireland, north and south, voted in favour of the Good Friday Agreement. Dalton denied that this was true: "The people of the 26 Counties didn't even get a chance to vote on the Stormont Agreement," he said.
This is an allegation the GFA's opponents have been levelling for years, and it baffles me. Did they not bother to read the text of the constitutional amendment they (presumably) voted against in 1998? The very first line of it reads:
The State may consent to be bound by the British-Irish Agreement done at Belfast on the 10th day of April, 1998, hereinafter called the Agreement.
You can't get much clearer than that. Obviously the most emotive part of the referendum, for most people in the 26, was the removal of Articles 2 and 3 but it's pure historical revisionism to claim - as RSF and the others constantly do - that that is all the southern electorate voted on.
I'm not the world's biggest fan of the GFA, but I really don't see any credible argument that its passage wasn't the will of the Irish people as expressed at the time."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/6762187931814481462/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=6762187931814481462&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/6762187931814481462?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/6762187931814481462"
["link"]=>
string(72) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/11/republican-revisionism-and-gfa.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "4"
}
}
[19]=>
array(13) {
["id"]=>
string(58) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-906622876775630991"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2007-10-24T17:29:00.000+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2007-10-24T17:42:02.059+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2007-10-24T17:42:02.059+01:00"
}
["atom_content"]=>
string(4945) "It’s reported today that the Common Travel Area between Britain and Ireland will officially come to an end in 2009.
I say “officially” because the Irish government has been unilaterally ignoring the agreement for some time now. I’ve noted this as a semi-regular traveller to Britain: it’s been years since I’ve encountered any kind of passport check upon arrival at an airport in that country, but there are always checks when I come home. So it seems the Brits are just bringing their policy in line with ours. Which is ironic, given our frequent trotting out of the excuse that we can’t do this or that because it might affect the CTA – an excuse that is usually bullshit, as in this instance, for example. In the Dáil today, the Taoiseach also confirmed my long-held suspicion that the CTA excuse previously offered for us not joining the Schengen open border arrangement was only a pretense:
…should we join Schengen, the answer is "no"
It’s also been confirmed that the new arrangements will not apply to the land border between the two jurisdictions. No surprises there. I don’t believe either government would have had the stomach for that. So what will probably happen instead is that border security will be beefed up at Stranraer and Troon (I gave up that Parkhead season book just in time!). No doubt, there will be more instances of Irish nationals being subjected to racist requirements that they write their names in English, something that would never occur to the British authorities to demand of Polish or Spanish passengers. But it's interesting to contemplate the psychological effect of moving the de facto border back to where it belongs.
The other ironic thing about this is that its announcement takes place the same week that the Irish government finally introduces legislation to outlaw human trafficking. As everyone in the migration field knows, but politicians stubbornly refuse to acknowledge, tightening border controls actually facilitates rather than hindering traffickers. It means that there are more people unable to avail of legal means of migration and having to resort to illegal means; a larger and more lucrative black market in forged documents, which in turn provides a greater incentive to criminals to get involved in the business, and often a greater debt for the victim to have to repay to their trafficker, meaning a longer time they are held in debt bondage. Western countries in recent years have tightened their borders considerably and at the same time, the trafficking rate has increased. This isn’t a coincidence.
Finally, I have to wonder what the effect will be on the immigrant women in this country who find themselves with unwanted pregnancies and now face yet another barrier to obtaining a safe and legal abortion. A recent report in The Lancet (summary available at that link; free registration required for the full article) proved what some of us would call the bleedin’ obvious: laws against abortion don’t prevent them but merely make them more dangerous. In this country, we’ve largely been shielded from the latter effect because of the safety valve of travel to England – but many immigrant women don’t have that option. There is already some evidence of illegal abortions among this population and the only reason there haven’t been more is that the Irish government has quietly granted re-entry visas to women who wish to travel for this purpose (I don’t have a link for that, but it's accepted by activists on both sides of the debate). When Britain starts checking the passports of everyone who goes there from here, these women will need to ensure they also have a British entry visa and I’m not sure how willing the Home Office will be to accommodate them. Some increase in the number of illegal abortions here seems inevitable – and the consequences of that could be dire.
****
I realise I’ve said more in this post than I previously had for the whole month. Apologies for my quietness of late, and thanks to those of you who still check in regularly. I can’t promise to keep up as often as I’d like to, particularly given what looks to be an increasing workload for me, but I will always do what I can.
"
["link_replies"]=>
string(158) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/906622876775630991/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=906622876775630991&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(74) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/906622876775630991?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(67) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/906622876775630991"
["link"]=>
string(79) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/10/its-reported-today-that-common-travel.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "1"
}
}
[20]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-8605902516931375038"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2007-10-22T17:01:00.000+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2007-10-22T17:07:27.302+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2007-10-22T17:07:27.302+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(28) "Note to my northern comrades"
["atom_content"]=>
string(451) "When the Assembly is having a debate on abortion, it would be a good idea to have at least one woman MLA speak."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/8605902516931375038/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=8605902516931375038&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/8605902516931375038?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/8605902516931375038"
["link"]=>
string(70) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/10/note-to-my-northern-comrades.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "3"
}
}
[21]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-7060490234055155514"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2007-10-22T06:45:00.000+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2007-10-22T07:29:33.237+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2007-10-22T07:29:33.237+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(33) "Quick note on the Paul Quinn case"
["atom_content"]=>
string(1878) "As readers in Ireland will know by now, IRA members in South Armagh are being accused for the beating death of a young man near Castleblayney, County Monaghan.
On the killing itself, the comments of our local TD Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin are worth repeating:
Whatever circumstances are behind the attack there can be no justification for this type of violence. I strongly condemn the attack which took place in my own constituency and urge that anyone with information relating to the murder go to the gardaí immediately.
I would caution against a rush to judgement about the perpetrators. Just because the family believes republicans were involved doesn't mean they were. See my previous post on Joe Rafferty's murder, and remember also the case of Gareth O'Connor, for whose disappearance the IRA was widely blamed until it was revealed that he had been touting to the PSNI on his comrades in the Real IRA.
Whoever was responsible, though, it should be obvious that - after Paul Quinn's family - the last people who would have wanted anything like this to happen are Sinn Féin. Whereas some of our opponents, in the media and on other web forums, seem to be nearly wetting themselves with glee.
For the sake of everyone and everything involved, I hope this is resolved as quickly as it can be, and with a minimum of political point-scoring."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/7060490234055155514/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=7060490234055155514&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/7060490234055155514?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/7060490234055155514"
["link"]=>
string(71) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/10/quick-note-on-paul-quinn-case.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "2"
}
}
[22]=>
array(13) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-4567557260744432320"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2007-09-28T11:17:00.000+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2007-09-28T11:40:53.464+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2007-09-28T11:40:53.464+01:00"
}
["atom_content"]=>
string(2180) "Today's Times (subs required) reports that black taxi drivers are finding it difficult to pick up fares in Dublin and other areas. They say that passengers at ranks are going past them and getting into cabs with white drivers.
The National Taxi Drivers' Union president, Tommy Gorman, denies that racism is involved and suggests that people may have had previous experience with "coloured" drivers (what century are we in again?) not knowing where they were going.
Of course, this never happens with white Irish drivers. Oh no. I never had to give a white Irish taxi driver directions from Heuston Station to Dundrum. I never had to give a white Irish taxi driver directions from O'Connell Street to Phibsboro, for fuck's sake. Yes, Phibsboro. I never had a white Irish taxi driver get hopelessly lost trying to get me from Cabra to the Coolmine rail station. These incidents must all be figments of my imagination.
Gorman made his comments in the context of suggestions that white drivers should refuse to take these fares. He was defending the white drivers for failing to do so. That's understandable. He's a union leader, and the role of a union leader is to stand up for the union workers. But what he seems to be missing here is that he's the president of all the NTDU workers - including the black ones. He should be standing up for them, too, not suggesting these occurrences are their own fault.
The suggestion that taxi drivers should have to take a local knowledge test is a sensible one. If implemented, it would surely weed out most of those drivers (Irish and non-Irish, black, white or whatever) who don't know where they're going. But will it, as Gorman suggests, weed out those passengers who refuse to get into a cab with a black person driving it? Somehow, I don't think so."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/4567557260744432320/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=4567557260744432320&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/4567557260744432320?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/4567557260744432320"
["link"]=>
string(81) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/09/todays-times-subs-required-reports-that.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "1"
}
}
[23]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-7076989831418814700"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2007-09-27T16:43:00.000+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2007-09-27T16:51:37.160+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2007-09-27T16:51:37.160+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(47) "What a difference a year makes … or maybe not"
["atom_content"]=>
string(2889) "I’d kind of forgotten all about this post. It was brought back to me when I had a look at my visitor stats and noticed someone with an ISP from Fianna Fáil headquarters doing a trawl for blog posts on ‘Bertiegate’. A little worried up at Mount Street, are we?
In retrospect, of course, I think I was a little easy on de Taoiseach. I’m still of the view that there isn’t – so far – hard evidence of anything beyond general sliminess and misjudgement. The inconsistencies that have arisen since then obviously strengthen the case against him, and darken the cloud over his head, to a degree that would embarrass most western leaders into stepping down. But again, this is Ireland we’re talking about, and Fianna Fáil. Even if Bertie goes – and don’t get me wrong, he should – the state is still going to be run by people to whom the going rate of a terraced house is money to be casually handed out to ‘friends’. And it’s still going to be run for those people, which to my mind is the real scandal.
I’ve been struck by this over the past couple days, with the news about Tuesday's Garda shooting in Dublin. That’s obviously a serious and newsworthy story but for God’s sake does nobody see the link between the greed that leads to that kind of behaviour, and the kind that results in fatcats having enormous sums of cash to distribute in ‘whiparounds’ for politicians, and the kind that results in stories like this one? What, apart from the social class of the participants, is the real difference? Thousands of people die in this country every year as a result of poverty, inequitable access to essential health care or other forms of government malfeasance which occur as a direct result of the privileging of the business class at the expense of everyone else - are their lives worth less than the relative handful of people killed by working class gangsters? I don’t think so.
The plain fact of the matter is that this state is controlled by people who have no regard for the law, no concern for anyone else’s well-being and no interest more pressing than stuffing their own pockets. It should hardly come as a surprise to them that some of the proles want in on the action, and are equally indifferent to the consequences of the means they have at their disposal."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/7076989831418814700/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=7076989831418814700&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/7076989831418814700?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/7076989831418814700"
["link"]=>
string(81) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/09/what-difference-year-makes-or-maybe-not.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[24]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-3487967907510698352"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2007-09-11T17:44:00.000+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2007-09-11T18:09:38.688+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2007-09-11T18:09:38.688+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(40) "Quick note on the unmarried fathers case"
["atom_content"]=>
string(1262) "Good news in this case. I haven't followed it closely, and I understand it's probably only a limited victory, but it is certainly a good decision - not just for the man in question and his children, but also for common sense.
I have a problem with a lot of the fathers' rights crowd. Too often their complaints about the Irish legal system descend into rants on feminism - as if the legislators and judges who came up with our family law were all mad women's libbers, rather than ultraconservative Catholics trying to discourage extramarital sex and believing that women should mind the kids, preferably while standing barefoot and pregnant [but only by their husband] in the kitchen.
But the underlying argument - that unmarried fathers in particular are grossly discriminated against in Irish law - is virtually undebatable. Today's decision may be only a small step toward reversing this ridiculous injustice, but it's a welcome one."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/3487967907510698352/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=3487967907510698352&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/3487967907510698352?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/3487967907510698352"
["link"]=>
string(78) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2007/09/quick-note-on-unmarried-fathers-case.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "5"
}
}
}
["channel"]=>
array(12) {
["id"]=>
string(34) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2008-12-04T22:02:35.757Z"
["title"]=>
string(31) "Wednesday's Irish politics blog"
["link_http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed"]=>
string(48) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"
["link_self"]=>
string(48) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"
["link"]=>
string(29) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/"
["link_next"]=>
string(78) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?start-index=26&max-results=25"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["generator"]=>
string(7) "Blogger"
["opensearch"]=>
array(3) {
["totalresults"]=>
string(3) "194"
["startindex"]=>
string(1) "1"
["itemsperpage"]=>
string(2) "25"
}
}
["textinput"]=>
array(0) {
}
["image"]=>
array(0) {
}
["feed_type"]=>
string(4) "Atom"
["feed_version"]=>
NULL
["stack"]=>
array(0) {
}
["inchannel"]=>
bool(false)
["initem"]=>
bool(false)
["incontent"]=>
bool(false)
["intextinput"]=>
bool(false)
["inimage"]=>
bool(false)
["current_field"]=>
string(0) ""
["current_namespace"]=>
bool(false)
["_CONTENT_CONSTRUCTS"]=>
array(6) {
[0]=>
string(7) "content"
[1]=>
string(7) "summary"
[2]=>
string(4) "info"
[3]=>
string(5) "title"
[4]=>
string(7) "tagline"
[5]=>
string(9) "copyright"
}
["last_modified"]=>
string(31) "Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:02:35 GMT
"
["etag"]=>
string(30) "W/"AkYBRHk-fyp7ImA9WxRbFE8."
"
}
}
["feed"]=>
object(MagpieRSS)#169 (19) {
["parser"]=>
int(0)
["current_item"]=>
array(0) {
}
["items"]=>
array(25) {
[0]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-6866079651303699574"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-27T10:18:00.004Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-27T10:45:08.017Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-27T10:45:08.017Z"
}
["title"]=>
string(24) "Quick note on Harneygate"
["atom_content"]=>
string(1889) "As much as I dislike Mary Harney - and boy, do I dislike her - I'm finding myself fairly disgusted with the calls for her step down for getting her hair done on the public purse.
It's not that I think the expenditure was justified. But I can't recall anyone saying that Bertie should step down when it was revealed that more than the average industrial wage was being spent on his make-up. People said it was excessive, certainly. But his position wasn't held to be "untenable" because of it.
You can't separate this hullaballoo from gender issues. Women in the public eye are relentlessly judged for their appearance, Harney more than many others. There is a really nasty undertone to some of the comments being made in the blogosphere about this. Women who consider standing for election know full well they'll be subject to the same excruciating level of scrutiny for their hair, their clothes, their weight. Don't think for a moment this isn't a contributing factor to the under-participation of women in politics.
Harney should resign, of course. But I've always said that. She should resign because of the millions of taxpayer euros she's giving away to developers at the expense of the public healthcare system. That's the important issue, not the fact that she - like the Taoiseach and all male office holders - has an excessive personal appearance budget."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/6866079651303699574/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=6866079651303699574&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/6866079651303699574?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/6866079651303699574"
["link"]=>
string(66) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/11/quick-note-on-harneygate.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[1]=>
array(13) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-3872549972806220792"
["published"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-23T13:34:00.005Z"
["updated"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-23T13:41:09.902Z"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(24) "2008-11-23T13:41:09.902Z"
}
["atom_content"]=>
string(963) "My head's buried pretty deeply in textbooks these days, but I did think this item was worth drawing attention to:
Alistair Darling will make a high-risk bid to lead Britain out of recession tomorrow, when he is expected to cut VAT and entice the British people to go on a pre-Christmas spending spree.
...
The cut is expected to see the rate drop from its current level of 17.5 per cent
Meanwhile, of course, down here in the Free State, VAT is set to go up from 21 to 21.5% as of Monday week.
Should do wonders for the "don't shop in Newry" campaign, huh?
"
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/3872549972806220792/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=3872549972806220792&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/3872549972806220792?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/3872549972806220792"
["link"]=>
string(74) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/11/my-heads-buried-pretty-deeply-in.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[2]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-6623835695751110738"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T13:37:00.004+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T14:51:28.737+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T14:51:28.737+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(24) "In other Blueshirt news,"
["atom_content"]=>
string(635) "it seems that little Terence Flanagan managed to fill only about a third of the thirty minutes alloted to him to speak on the Electoral Amendment Bill in the Dáil today.
He was the first opposition speaker to participate in the debate. I guess that's what happens when you have nobody to plagiarise ..."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/6623835695751110738/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=6623835695751110738&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/6623835695751110738?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/6623835695751110738"
["link"]=>
string(65) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/09/in-other-blueshirt-news.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[3]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-4436187573024994274"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T11:59:00.003+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T12:17:57.375+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-24T12:17:57.375+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(23) "Quick note on "pairing""
["atom_content"]=>
string(1716) "I'd imagine that few people, other than anoraks such as myself, had any idea what Enda Kenny was talking about when he announced that Fine Gael would refuse to "pair" with the Government over their refusal to allow a debate on the economy.
The Times helpfully explains that:
Under the vote-pairing deal, opposition TDs absent themselves from votes if a minister – with whom they have been “paired” cannot be present due to official business.
I'd just like to make it clear that it is not the case that pairing occurs only when a minister is away on official business. In fact, Fine Gael have quite willingly engaged in this practice when backbenchers have been away for personal reasons. They may be valid personal reasons, but so what? The point of pairing is to prevent important state business from grinding to a halt, which is something that all parties (at least theoretically) have an interest in. If the ruling parties can't get enough TDs elected to ensure their bills never fall due to too many non-official absences on their part, it's not the role of the opposition to give them a leg up.
And if you want to know how I know that FG (and others, incidentally, but never Sinn Féin) have engaged in this practice, it's because occasionally the list of "official pairs" inadvertently finds its way into my clutches."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/4436187573024994274/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=4436187573024994274&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/4436187573024994274?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/4436187573024994274"
["link"]=>
string(63) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/09/quick-note-on-pairing.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[4]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-2553176457633230727"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-12T11:38:00.009+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-12T12:23:28.870+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-12T12:23:28.870+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(26) "No sex please, we're Irish"
["atom_content"]=>
string(4894) "Ah, the irony. Only yesterday over at the Cedar Lounge a contributor drew a rather smug distinction between the US and this country on the basis of the public role of religious extremists – over there, we were told, they are “political movers and shakers” while here they are confined merely to “prayer crusades”. My immediate reaction, as noted on the linked page, was to point out the flaw in that argument from a non-partitionist perspective. And then I went to have a look at today’s papers and found these news items from well below the border: 750 pornographic DVDs seized in Dublin and Labour calls for laws to fight sex shops.
Let’s look at these one at a time. The first article tells us that the DVDs were seized “as a result of an ongoing Community Policing Unit investigation into breaches of the Video Recording Act of 1989”. Yes, you read that correctly. A Community Policing Unit investigation into porn videos. In Dublin 2. Honestly, have the community police there no better use of their time? Maybe going after the tourist-muggers in Temple Bar? The gangs that hang round ATMs on Grafton Street waiting to distract you and grab your cash? The bicycle thieves on George’s Street? If the residential areas in that part of the city are anything like mine, I’d guess there are a few social housing estates whose residents have all but given up phoning the police when there are problems because the response is so thoroughly inadequate it isn’t even worth the effort. Well, now we know why. Maybe instead of reporting break-ins, drug dealing and cars on fire, they should tell the Gardaí there’s a porno outside.
The second article tells us that those champions of progressive, liberal values the Labour Party are shocked – shocked! – to find that not only do such DVDs exist, but the shops that sell them are subject to the same rules as any other shop. Not good enough apparently; they should have to apply for a specific change of use so that the wishes of those residents who would patronise such a shop can be vetoed by those residents who think they shouldn’t.
Labour’s Joe Costello is particularly outraged that two adult shops were able to open across from churches in his constituency. That’s my constituency too, and I know at least one of the shops he’s referring to, and frankly the fact that anyone could get exercised about it suggests to me that they are either stuck in de Valeraland or have far too much time on their hands. The part of the shop that is visible to anyone outside it is very discreetly-designed; there is no merchandise in view or any images whatsoever. If you couldn’t read enough English to know what “adult shop” meant, you wouldn’t even know what it was. Apart from the extraneous apostrophe in “DVD’s”, in fact, I’m hard pressed to find anything offensive about it. And so the fuck what if it’s across from a church? What gives people coming to or going from church the right not to encounter any reminders of how the human race reproduces?
There’s an argument to be made, from a community perspective, against having a whole conglomerate of these shops in one neighbourhood. An area that has come to be known as a red light district can be fairly unpleasant to live in, in some cases even unsafe. But that’s not the argument Labour are making. Effectively, they want local authorities to be able to prevent any sex shop from opening anywhere if enough people (and how many is “enough”?) complain that it’s unsuitable. The Council’s attempt less than ten years ago to close the Ann Summers on O’Connell Street – O’Connell Street, for fuck’s sake – suggests that such a power is likely to be interpreted broadly, making adult shops all but impossible to open in the State. Would it be the end of the world if that happened? Of course not, but it would further undermine any claim of Ireland (south) to be somehow more secularly advanced than the US.
We may not put people like Sarah Palin in high office here, but it doesn't look to me like we need them."
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/2553176457633230727/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=2553176457633230727&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/2553176457633230727?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/2553176457633230727"
["link"]=>
string(66) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/09/no-sex-please-were-irish.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "8"
}
}
[5]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(58) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-519935665485553286"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-08-20T10:07:00.004+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-12T12:20:11.694+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-09-12T12:20:11.694+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(31) "What's wrong with this picture?"
["atom_content"]=>
string(2031) "From today's Times:
A 17-YEAR-old girl, whom gardaí believe was trafficked into Ireland to work in the sex industry, has been remanded on continuing bail.
...
The girl, who is from Nigeria and cannot be named for legal reasons, is charged with failing to produce a passport or another form of identification.
Now maybe this is a product of my wild imagination, but I can think of a pretty good reason why a person who had been trafficked into the country might not have a passport or another form of identification. A few pretty good reasons, in fact.
The Government has repeatedly justified its refusal to legislate for the rights of trafficking victims on the basis that the Garda Síochána treat all such persons "sympathetically", "with respect and dignity" and so on. Yes, that's exactly how I would describe bringing criminal charges against someone for not making sure they had their identity papers with them when they were trafficked.
The threat of prosecution, deportation and other such punitive measures is a very effective way to discourage trafficking victims coming forward. This is a no-brainer. It's so obvious that even Michael McDowell as Minister always insisted (not in so many words, admittedly) that it didn't happen. And yet that's precisely what's happening right now in Carlow-Kilkenny.
It's a disgrace and a scandal and I cannot understand why the migrant and women's rights sectors are not all over it.
"
["link_replies"]=>
string(158) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/519935665485553286/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=519935665485553286&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(74) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/519935665485553286?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(67) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/519935665485553286"
["link"]=>
string(71) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/08/whats-wrong-with-this-picture.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "5"
}
}
[6]=>
array(13) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-7617949953224684842"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-08-19T12:24:00.004+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-08-19T14:42:27.356+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-08-19T14:42:27.356+01:00"
}
["atom_content"]=>
string(4812) "As the dwindling numbers of people who read this blog will know, I haven't been excited by much Irish news lately. But this article, pressing as it does a number of my buttons, made me sit up and take notice:
TEACHERS last night gave a guarded backing to calls for immigrant children who cannot speak English properly to be "segregated" in our classrooms.
This followed a Fine Gael call yesterday for the Government to separate immigrant children with poor language skills from the rest of their classmates.
...
His comments attracted qualified support from the ASTI [secondary teachers' union] last night. However, they preferred to describe the teaching of immigrant children apart as putting them in “immersion classes” rather than “segregation”.
The ASTI spokeswoman said an understanding of English was the key to the integration of immigrant children in schools.
Doubtless there will be knee-jerk responses to this from both sides. Not that anybody listens to me, but I would plead for a few points to be kept in mind. The first being that there are several different considerations involved here, such as:
- How non-English speaking children can learn the language as quickly as possible
- How to prevent them falling behind in their other subjects
- How to ensure English-speaking children aren't brought down as a result of all this
The biggest problem, it seems to me, is that there isn't necessarily one solution that effectively addresses all three of these issues (and that's before we even get into the subject of the social and psychological effects of separating students). I remember the bilingual education debate that was raging in California when I lived there in the 1990s - for all I know, it still is. One side presented studies showing that totally immersing the kids in English was the quickest way to teach them the language. The other side presented studies showing that own-language education in addition to intensive English was the most effective way to promote their all-around academic achievement. Sometimes, these were the same studies. Even proponents of one particular viewpoint were at times forced to admit that it wasn't necessarily a question of finding the "right" solution, but of deciding which aim to prioritise.
Language is a funny beast. It arouses almost inexplicable passions in people, often in inverse proportion to the amount they actually know about it. As was once pointed out to me by a friend of mine with an advanced degree in the subject, so much about language is counter-intuitive - and yet there seems to be hardly anyone out there without a very firm, almost visceral, opinion on the right way to deal with the vexing linguistic issues that arise. It's true for a lot of subjects, of course, that people form views from which they can't be swayed no matter how much contrary evidence is put in front of them. But language seems to me to be exceptional in the extent to which people care so much on the basis of so little understanding of how it actually works.
And it hardly needs to be added that people's views on the subject are often influenced to a great degree by their views on immigration and multiculturalism in general. This makes it difficult, at times, to sort out legitimate concerns about educational standards from lumpen xenophobia just looking for a respectable excuse to latch onto. Of course this works in reverse too: those of us who think of diversity as a positive end in itself are sometimes guilty of not thinking through the practical consequences of policies designed to promote it.
The education of children is an area where society simply cannot afford the hazards of such knee-jerk reactions from either side. It's too important to be decided on the basis of who's shouting the loudest, or which policy fits most neatly within a particular overall ideological framework. The government needs to look very closely at the available evidence - of which there is plenty, just ask the Californians - and make the decision that is demonstrated to be genuinely best for the children, regardless of how (un)popular it is. I know what I hope that decision turns out to be, but it's not for me to advocate. I don't really understand how it works either.
"
["link_replies"]=>
string(160) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/7617949953224684842/comments/defaulthttps://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=12894384&postID=7617949953224684842&isPopup=true"
["link_edit"]=>
string(75) "http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12894384/posts/default/7617949953224684842?v=2"
["link_self"]=>
string(68) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/7617949953224684842"
["link"]=>
string(81) "http://ceadaoin.blogspot.com/2008/08/as-dwindling-numbers-of-people-who-read.html"
["author_name"]=>
string(9) "Wednesday"
["author_uri"]=>
string(51) "http://www.blogger.com/profile/09799255977193959208"
["author_email"]=>
string(19) "noreply@blogger.com"
["thr"]=>
array(1) {
["total"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
}
[7]=>
array(14) {
["id"]=>
string(59) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12894384.post-7072518951922247039"
["published"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-26T12:52:00.002+01:00"
["updated"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-26T13:05:54.910+01:00"
["app"]=>
array(1) {
["edited"]=>
string(29) "2008-06-26T13:05:54.910+01:00"
}
["title"]=>
string(27) "Overheard in Leinster House"
["atom_content"]=>
string(598) "A Fine Gael TD making a call on their mobile:
"Hello ... , can I get back that €20 I loaned you yesterday? I'm meeting someone for coffee."
No wonder Enda Kenny has been so critical of the Government this week. You know times are tough when even culchies earning upwards of €95,000 have to go around begging for change for a cuppa.